Main image
17th January
2013
written by Sean Noble

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yesterday, surrounded by children, Obama signed 23 executive orders that amounted to very little.  He also urged Congress to pass legislation banning “assault weapons,” or guns that look kind of scary, and impose a 10-round limit for magazines.  There is little chance such legislation could pass the Democrat-controlled Senate, let alone the GOP-led House.

But Obama doesn’t care, because the real purpose of yesterday’s event was to show, through photo-op, that if you aren’t in favor of the president’s assault on the 2nd Amendment, you must want more innocent children to die.  The president even read portions of the letters these kids sent to him, urging stricter gun control so that “everybody [can] be happy and safe.”  So, the President of the United States is now taking legislative advice from children.  (Next thing you know, Obamacare will cover imaginary friends—but I digress.)

The gall on display at this dog and pony show was astounding.  With a straight face, Obama declared, “Congress needs to help, rather than hinder, law enforcement as it does its job.  We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning around and selling them to criminals.  And we should severely punish anybody who helps them do this.”  Which is why today I am firing Eric Holder and urging a thorough investigation of Operation Fast and furious—Ok, so he didn’t say that last part…but it does fit doesn’t it?

I couldn’t help but think about Brian Terry’s mother as Obama made this statement.  Her son, a U.S. Border Patrol agent, and hundreds of innocent Mexicans were murdered with weapons the United States Justice Department knowingly provided to dangerous drug cartels.  More than 2000 guns from the operation are missing, people have died, and nobody has been punished or held accountable.  Now Obama is going to go after law-abiding, responsible gun owners.  It’s absurd.

In the end, this may have very little to do with guns.  Obama is using the Newtown-inspired gun control debate to highlight congress’ “inability to act.”  He chastises them for failing to confirm an ATF director (although he hasn’t put effort into nominating viable candidates and promoting their confirmation) and he urges gun legislation he knows can’t pass either chamber.  To the American people, Congress appears even more immobile.

This allows Obama to claim, “Congress, who won’t even protect the children, refuses to act on X, so I will, for the good of the country.”  Get ready for more executive orders, more czars, and more power grabs over the next four years.  I guess our founders truly did understand what tyranny could look like 200+ years into the future.

Be Sociable, Share!

2 Comments

  1. 17/01/2013

    As much as I disagree with President Obama on the benefits of more gun regulation I must say that his Executive Orders so far have been rather in conformance with the rules the US government is supposed to live by. From here on out the Democrat administration and cheer team have 3 years and 10 months to impose greater enforcement and more rules and convince We the People that it has been effective. I won’t say they can’t do it but I will say that they are running out of time.

    http://www.a-human-right.com/

  2. Dave Drage
    18/01/2013

    The purpose of fighting is to win.
    There is no possible victory in defense.
    The sword is more important than the shield, and skill is more important than either.
    The final weapon is the brain. — All else is supplemental.

    As John Steinbeck once said:

    1. Don’t pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he’ll just kill you.

    2. If you find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck.

    3. I carry a gun cause a cop is too heavy.

    4. When seconds count, the cops are just minutes away.

    5. A reporter did a human-interest piece on the Texas Rangers. The reporter recognized the Colt Model 1911 the Ranger was carrying and asked him “Why do you carry a 45?” The Ranger responded, “Because they don’t make a 46.”

    6. An armed man will kill an unarmed man with monotonous regularity.

    7. The old sheriff was attending an awards dinner when a lady commented on his wearing his sidearm. “Sheriff, I see you have your pistol. Are you expecting trouble?” “No Ma’am. If I were expecting trouble, I would have brought my rifle.”

    8. Beware the man who only has one gun. HE PROBABLY KNOWS HOW TO USE IT!!!

    But wait, there’s more!

    I was once asked by a lady visiting if I had a gun in the house. I said I did. She said “Well I certainly hope it isn’t loaded!” To which I said, of course it is loaded, can’t work without bullets!” She then asked, “Are you that afraid of some one evil coming into your house?” My reply was, “No not at all. I am not afraid of the house catching fire either, but I have fire extinguishers around, and they are all loaded too.” To which I’ll add, having a gun in the house that isn’t loaded is like having a car in the garage without gas in the tank.
    I’m a firm believer of the 2nd Amendment!

Leave a Reply