Main image
27th October
written by Sean Noble

John Fund, writer extraordinaire for the Wall Street Journal, is a smart, connected and a fixture in the D.C. – New York power corridor. And sometimes he finds the most obscure stuff to expose in a pretty darn funny way. This is from a recent WSJ Political Diary piece. ┬áThere is nothing I can add to this.

Here, Kitty, Kitty . . .

Is it time to eat Fluffy in order to save the planet?

I’ve always wanted to read an environmental book that was brutally honest about the size of the sacrifices the greens are demanding of average people. Now Brenda and Robert Vale, two professors at New Zealand’s Victoria University and winners of a United Nations Global 500 Award for Environmental Achievement, have filled that market niche. Their new book is provocatively titled: “Time to Eat the Dog? The Real Guide to Sustainable Living.”

They argue that the carbon pawprint of a typical canine is twice that of an SUV that’s driven 6,000 miles a year. The main reason is all the energy that goes into producing meat for its diet. Keeping a cat is the equivalent of owning a Volkswagen Golf. Two hamsters are as bad for the planet as owning a plasma TV.

In order to stave off global warming, the Vales suggest pet owners swap dogs and cats for creatures they can eat, such as chickens or rabbits. “There is certainly some truth in the fact that if we have edible pets like chickens for their eggs and meat, and rabbits and pigs, we will be compensating for the impact of other things on our environment,” the authors write.

The authors issue a dire warning about the eco-hazards of a wealthy lifestyle. If everyone shared the standard of living of Americans, they say, humanity would need five planet Earths to sustain itself. Thus it’s allegedly time to take drastic measures: People should ride bikes for all but the longest errands, and they should give up holidays. The authors even offer marriage advice: Don’t get divorced until you find a new partner so you can save the environmental cost of maintaining two homes.

Robert Vale says the couple wrote their book because current efforts fall so pitifully short in tackling the world’s environmental problems. “There are so many wussy sustainability books out there. It’s a bit more complex than grocery bags and light bulbs.”

I agree. That’s why getting people to think about eating Fido will help clarify just how far-reaching the aims of radical environmentalists are.

— John Fund

Be Sociable, Share!


  1. 27/10/2009

    Do you think this is serious? I think sometimes people ‘over-think’. They are missing the forest for the trees. There’s things we can do to help maintain the planet… but geez… this? I love the ‘don’t get a divorce until you find a new partner’ theory… ya, see? missing the forest for the trees!

  2. Woody

    So Al Gore talks the talk, but John Edwards walks the walk!

  3. Matt

    The need to stop smoking the Hemp they are growing! They miss the integral part of society that dogs and cats have been, for protection, hunting, and vermin (disease vectors) control. Besides, in a pinch you can Wok the dog and cat just as easily as rabbit and chicken.

Leave a Reply