Main image
29th April
2009
written by Sean Noble

The spectacle of Arlen Specter (R D – PA) switching from Republican to Democrat to save his political hide is an example of politicians gone wild.

The boys at Liberty’s Apothecary have a great treatment of this whole episode – complete with quotes from Specter a few weeks ago promising that he was not going to leave the Republican Party.

Specter has been a black mark on the GOP for years.  He only acts and sounds like a Republican in election years, and has ended up creating more problems for Republicans that he is worth.  It is no secret that I have never been fond of Specter, and this turn of events has me feeling vindicated. With friends like these…

Here is a look inside the mind of Specter as he wrote his statement:

I have been a Republican since 1966. (Well, I’ve been a Republican in name, at least) I have been working extremely hard for the Party, (trying to make it more liberal, and less like Reagan and Goldwater) for its candidates and for the ideals of a Republican Party whose tent is big enough to welcome diverse points of view. (Unless those points of view include lower taxes, more individual responsibility and freedom in general) While I have been comfortable being a Republican, (because I’m comfortable being a fraud) my Party has not defined who I am. (Because I’m not really a Republican and never have been) I have taken each issue one at a time and have exercised independent judgment to do what I thought was best for Pennsylvania and the nation. (At least in the cases when it was also best for me)

Since my election in 1980, as part of the Reagan Big Tent, the Republican Party has moved far to the right. (Because fighting for freedom is a really wing-nut thing to do) Last year, more than 200,000 Republicans in Pennsylvania changed their registration to become Democrats.  I now find my political philosophy more in line with Democrats than Republicans. (Especially since Democrats are in control of the Senate and I really miss being a Chairman)

When I supported the stimulus package, I knew that it would not be popular with the Republican Party. But, I saw the stimulus as necessary to lessen the risk of a far more serious recession than we are now experiencing. (I mean, who really believes all this “free market” crap anyway?)

Since then, I have traveled the State, talked to Republican leaders and office-holders and my supporters and I have carefully examined public opinion. (Because polling is the most important guidepost to what I do) It has become clear to me that the stimulus vote caused a schism which makes our differences irreconcilable. (For some reason, people think that more government is part of the problem – they’re so small-minded) On this state of the record, I am unwilling to have my twenty-nine year Senate record judged by the Pennsylvania Republican primary electorate. (I’m such an experienced politician, that I shouldn’t have to follow the rules, laws and I can’t tolerate been held responsible for my actions by people so out of touch with reality that they actually VOTE in a Republican primary) I have not represented the Republican Party. I have represented the people of Pennsylvania. (At least the liberal elite people of Pennsylvania)

I have decided to run for re-election in 2010 in the Democratic primary. (The polling shows that I’d get killed by Pat Toomey in a Republican primary, so I’m freeing myself of the party of freedom so I can say what I really believe and Democrat voters will like me for it)

I am ready, willing and anxious to take on all comers and have my candidacy for re-election determined in a general election. (I have to sound tough, but I really, really hope Toomey doesn’t run against me)

I deeply regret that I will be disappointing many friends and supporters. (I’m sorry they are so close-minded that they don’t understand that I’m too important to have to actually defend the votes I’ve cast.  Don’t they know who I am?) I can understand their disappointment. (I don’t really understand it, because my training includes Scottish Law) I am also disappointed that so many in the Party I have worked for for more than four decades do not want me to be their candidate. (Those ingrates should love me! The lobbyists in D.C. love me, why don’t Pennsylvania Republicans love me?) It is very painful on both sides. I thank specially Senators McConnell and Cornyn for their forbearance. (I need to mention a couple Republican leaders to make this whole joke of a statement sound more serious and sincere. The truth is, those guys are suckers. They totally bought my statement last month when I said I wouldn’t leave the GOP. Ha!)

I am not making this decision because there are no important and interesting opportunities outside the Senate. (I’m sure there are lots of important and interesting opportunities outside the Senate, but no one would hire me to work on any of them) I take on this complicated run for re-election because I am deeply concerned about the future of our country and I believe I have a significant contribution to make on many of the key issues of the day, especially medical research. NIH funding has saved or lengthened thousands of lives, including mine, and much more needs to be done. And my seniority is very important to continue to bring important projects vital to Pennsylvania’s economy. (I’ve got so much seniority in the Senate I can earmark better than Jack Murtha, and do it so it doesn’t look like corruption)

I am taking this action now because there are fewer than thirteen months to the 2010 Pennsylvania Primary and there is much to be done in preparation for that election. (I’m not ready to actually campaign and explain myself to voters) Upon request, I will return campaign contributions contributed during this cycle. (I may wait until 2011 to return those contributions, but it sounds good to offer to return them)

While each member of the Senate caucuses with his Party, what each of us hopes to accomplish is distinct from his party affiliation. (I don’t want to actually work to do anything that is in line with the Republican platform!) The American people do not care which Party solves the problems confronting our nation. (If I say that enough times, they’ll eventually buy it.  Why do we even have two parties anyway?  This whole issue of having to stand for election every six years is so 18th Century. Don’t they know that I have been anointed?) And no Senator, no matter how loyal he is to his Party, should or would put party loyalty above his duty to the state and nation.

My change in party affiliation does not mean that I will be a party-line voter any more for the Democrats that I have been for the Republicans. Unlike Senator Jeffords’ switch which changed party control, I will not be an automatic 60th vote for cloture. (Unless they promise me lots of good stuff) For example, my position on Employees Free Choice (Card Check) will not change. (Trust me)

Whatever my party affiliation, I will continue to be guided by President Kennedy’s statement that sometimes Party asks too much. When it does, I will continue my independent voting and follow my conscience on what I think is best for Pennsylvania and America. (As long as it is best for me)

Be Sociable, Share!
Tags: ,

10 Comments

  1. Zach
    29/04/2009

    I admit ignorance in congressional politics, but I recognize that Specter was not what one would label a dependable vote. So why does the AP report that his switch has rocked the GOP establishment? As far as I can tell, most conservatives are not surprised.

  2. Emma
    29/04/2009

    I guess it’s really just the shock that he actually made the change in name. I get a kick out of how bitter he is that he was going to lose the primary to Toomey and not even make it to the general- like somehow that’s everyone else’s fault and he is SO above primaries. “How dare they do this to me after I’ve had the title ‘Senator’ for this long? Who cares if I am not good at my job??” *giggle*

  3. Frankie
    29/04/2009

    I love how Toomey’s PAC is responsible for a great number of uber-conservatives winning primaries and then going on to lose in general elections. It will be sweet to see it happen to Toomey himself soon.

    I think Specter is right. The Republican party has closed it’s tent. The doors are shut. Nobody new is allowed in, and voters are getting the heck out of there.

  4. 29/04/2009

    Maybe the GOP should look at this turn of events for what it actually is. A referendum on the primary system. It looks as though the GOP is intolerant with anyone that breaks ranks with the party. Without GOP support, a candidate would have trouble getting through the primary system. This is a recipe for disaster for any moderate. When you look at the GOP’s current troubles you can identify moderates as a key detractor from the voting ranks. But this shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone. Look at the backlash to Specter by the right (this post is a great example).

    As a Democrat we welcome Specter with open arms. He can rub elbows with the Blue Dogs, the other moderate group in our party. Look what happened to Lieberman after his stand against Obama, no issues, we will welcome him back as well.

    Personally I love Specter’s stance against Card-Check, and hopefully he will be the voice that brings my party back to their senses on this issue.

  5. Zach
    29/04/2009

    I may not be smart or politically savvy, but I remember when Lieberman supported McCain. I remember when he supported the war. I remember that the party he had served for years and colleagues from congress left him out in the cold. Please, you belittle us both when you say this shows democrats are more tolerant.

    My question is really since he was already on the margins of the Republican party, why should it matter that he changed party affiliation? He doesn’t count as an automatic vote either way–unless you suggest because he now calls himself a democrat he is somehow compelled to vote differently.

    In fact, it seems he may lose some relevance because he can no longer be a maverick and garner headlines. The only people left to fight against are the democrats.

  6. 29/04/2009

    Is anybody up to doing a two head video of the Specter and alter-Specter’s speech?

  7. EVRep
    29/04/2009

    I have no problem with people switching parties on principle – Reagan did it when he felt that the Democratic party was getting unrealistic about the communist threat and history vindicated him. Reagan’s idol, Winston Churchill, switched parties on principle twice in his life, mainly over free trade. This is also Specter’s second party switch (he did it in the sixties when his path to the top was blocked in the Pennsylvania Democratic party), but it has nothing to do with principle. Arlen Specter is an empty, grasping, dirtbag and always has been. I find it hilarious that after leaving them to serve his own interests and kicking them in the teeth for forty years, he now expects Pennsylvania Democrats to nominate him at the age of 80, instead of one of their own. Forget about the $6M he has, a lot of politicans can put that together in Philadelphia and he will have to return a portion to those backers whose loyalty is to the party, rather than him personally. If he thinks they will nominate him just for seniority, he’s crazy – no state has voted for seniority since the South was trying to preserve segregation in the fifties (and lest we forget, Santorum was #3 in the senate). This is a fitting, ugly last chapter to an exceptionally ugly political career.

  8. Emily
    29/04/2009

    Specter leaving sends shivers up my spine. It means we can’t appreciate or recognize conservative-lefts who can hold seats in blue states. The way he is being condemned by Republicans is so High School. Makes me wonder what would be said about me if I felt forced out of the Republican Party. We should be honest here: Specter voted our way on critical issues of defense and judges. He attracted moderate-left people into our tent. He could hold on in a blue state. And we are worse, not better, off that he is gone. This Rush Limbaugh type anger to drive out everyone who doesn’t agree on everything is dangerous because it means we will lose in many places we now can’t even compete. And it certainly does nothing to build a bigger Party that can win national elections. Our infighting fails America because it means we aren’t governing!

  9. Frankie
    30/04/2009

    Did you know that the 39 Republican Senators represent 12% of the U.S. population. Keep that in mind when one of them starts whining about partisanship.

Leave a Reply